ECO 102 Project Assessment

 

Names: ______________________

 

  Comments Points
 

 

Content relevance

/10p

   
 

 

Logical development

/10p

   
 

 

Critical analysis

/10p

   
 

 

Report structure/ Referencing style

/10p

   
 

 

Written presentation

/10p

   
  Total/50  
 

 

 

 

 

Grade:

 

 
Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEVELOPMENT

Content Relevance

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Clear evidence of understanding and innovative thought.

 

All the material included was relevant to the task. The sections of Macro Economics included are relevant and relates to the country.

Satisfactory 70 – 60 Competent use of written sources.

 

Some irrelevant or repetitive material.

Needs more work

 

 

50< Over-reliance on material paraphrased from books/Web pages.

 

Too much irrelevant and/ or repetitive material that is not central to the topic.

Over reliance on one or two sources.

 

Logical development

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Develops a logical argument and organises ideas clearly. The essay structure flows well and sections lead into each well.
Satisfactory 70 – 60 Could be better organised by sequencing some of the material more appropriately.
Needs more work

 

 

50< Theme not clear. Lines of argument not clear enough.

 

Critical Analysis

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Well argued. All main issues explored and evaluated and conclusions reached. Clear evidence of research done, valid material used and own analysis made.
Satisfactory 70 – 60 Most main issues explored. Some analysis and evaluation.
Needs more work

 

 

50< Work is descriptive, one sided, work with little analysis or criticism.

 

STRUCTURE

Interpretation of task and introduction

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Introduction shows a sound understanding of the task and provides a clear outline of the scope of the essay. The synopsis gives clear and detailed information about the country in a concise manner.
Satisfactory 70 – 60 Introduction is limited and the scope of the task is not fully defined. Outdated or limited country synopsis.
Needs more work

 

 

50< Launches straight in with little or no attempt to introduce and define the task.

 

Task may have been misunderstood.

Conclusion

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Good concluding section drawing together the various important points made.
Satisfactory 70 – 60 Rather brief and formalised conclusion.
Needs more work

 

 

50< The writing ends abruptly and/ or rephrases the introduction.

 

References

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80> Correct referencing, using correct formats in all instances. Done alphabetically and clearly delineated.
Satisfactory 70 – 60 Referencing made, not in correct order, confusing and/or incomplete.
Needs more work.

 

 

50< More than 2 invalid references found /

 

Poor referencing/no referencing done.

 

 

 

 

4