ECO 102 Project Assessment

 

Names: ______________________

 

 CommentsPoints
 

 

Content relevance

/10p

  
 

 

Logical development

/10p

  
 

 

Critical analysis

/10p

  
 

 

Report structure/ Referencing style

/10p

  
 

 

Written presentation

/10p

  
 Total/50 
 

 

 

 

 

Grade:

 

 
Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEVELOPMENT

Content Relevance

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Clear evidence of understanding and innovative thought.

 

All the material included was relevant to the task. The sections of Macro Economics included are relevant and relates to the country.

Satisfactory70 – 60Competent use of written sources.

 

Some irrelevant or repetitive material.

Needs more work

 

 

50<Over-reliance on material paraphrased from books/Web pages.

 

Too much irrelevant and/ or repetitive material that is not central to the topic.

Over reliance on one or two sources.

 

Logical development

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Develops a logical argument and organises ideas clearly. The essay structure flows well and sections lead into each well.
Satisfactory70 – 60Could be better organised by sequencing some of the material more appropriately.
Needs more work

 

 

50<Theme not clear. Lines of argument not clear enough.

 

Critical Analysis

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Well argued. All main issues explored and evaluated and conclusions reached. Clear evidence of research done, valid material used and own analysis made.
Satisfactory70 – 60Most main issues explored. Some analysis and evaluation.
Needs more work

 

 

50<Work is descriptive, one sided, work with little analysis or criticism.

 

STRUCTURE

Interpretation of task and introduction

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Introduction shows a sound understanding of the task and provides a clear outline of the scope of the essay. The synopsis gives clear and detailed information about the country in a concise manner.
Satisfactory70 – 60Introduction is limited and the scope of the task is not fully defined. Outdated or limited country synopsis.
Needs more work

 

 

50<Launches straight in with little or no attempt to introduce and define the task.

 

Task may have been misunderstood.

Conclusion

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Good concluding section drawing together the various important points made.
Satisfactory70 – 60Rather brief and formalised conclusion.
Needs more work

 

 

50<The writing ends abruptly and/ or rephrases the introduction.

 

References

Excellent/

 

Very Good

80>Correct referencing, using correct formats in all instances. Done alphabetically and clearly delineated.
Satisfactory70 – 60Referencing made, not in correct order, confusing and/or incomplete.
Needs more work.

 

 

50<More than 2 invalid references found /

 

Poor referencing/no referencing done.

 

 

 

 

4