Titanic Film Review Essay Paper

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

For this assignment, you will need to watch a film that centers around an historical event or person and write an essay
that details the accuracy of its portrayal of the event/person. In order to complete this assignment correctly, you will
need to research the event/person and cross check the facts with the representation in the film. How accurate is the
film in comparison with what actually happened in real life? Keep in mind that there may be a balance of accuracy vs.
inaccuracy, and you can discuss both in the paper.

Do NOT Include:
Citations from other authors who have discussed a film’s accuracy. I do not want to see that you have regurgitated
something that someone else has said about this topic. I want to see that you are able to research an event and
measure accuracy based on your findings.
Do not use Wikipedia or blogs.
Do not include your own opinion about whether or not it is a good movie. It is not about whether it is good or bad or
if you liked it, but if it is accurate.

DO NOT WRITE THIS ON A DOCUMENTARY. I WANT YOU TO WRITE ON A FICTUALIZED ACCOUNT
OF A TRUE STORY. DOCUMENTARIES HAVE LESS LEEWAY AND USUALLY STICK TO EXACT
RE-TELLING WITH FEWER DIRECTORIAL DISCREPANCIES.

Do Include:
Citations from a variety of sources that discuss the event or person to prove that you are correct in
measuring the film’s accuracy.
Specific examples from the film.
Reasoning behind why the writer/director may have changed or embellished details.
The effect the differences have on the original story.
Requirements:

MLA format
4 pages in length plus works cited page (not included in page count)
At least three sources with in-text citations

Grading Rubrics

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.