Social Sciences Research Proposal Essay

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

Proposal draft as well as draft for all docs in the appendix will be provided

Request For Proposals (RFP) on Schools/Education and Inequality

Social Sciences Research Proposal

Research questions and hypotheses should be grounded in relevant theoretical and empirical work.
Proposals may include no more than 8 double spaced pages of text, not including title page, abstract, table of contents, references, and any appendices. Minimum font size is 10 points and minimum margins are 1 inch on all sides. References and citations should be presented using ASA style guidelines. Relevant materials related to research ethics and Institutional Review Board guidelines must be submitted as an appendix to the proposal. Other appendices may include, but are not limited to, surveys, interview schedules, background statistics, and letters of support from collaborators.
All proposals should use mixed methods (both survey research and qualitative research). Funded projects will have a maximum budget of $5,000 including principal investigator salary and benefits. The maximum project length is 6 months although first phases of longitudinal projects will be considered

Appendix must include
Google Form Survey
Ethics Consent Form
Bibliography
Budget
Timeline

Social Sciences Research Proposal

Final proposal must contain a short abstract before the Introduction. Remember that an abstract is Not an introduction to your proposal but rather a brief summary of your overall proposal’s key elements.

All red markups and other visible editing features from your Draft Proposal and Appendix items must be corrected and/or deleted in your Final Proposal submission. This also includes the blue text and brackets from the original Proposal template; your submission should contain only black text.

Social Sciences Research Proposal

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Proposition Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.