Qualitative & Quantitative Research Methods

“Qualitative & Quantitative research methods are the best!” AttachmentCOLLAPSE

Statement 1:

“Qualitative research methods are the best!” Qualitative research is based on inductive logic that explores the deeper issues. Crawford (2016) Qualitative research gathers data and draws conclusions from data that’s observed (Crawford, 2019, p. 70). “…. qualitative approaches can help discover, identify, and more richly describe what the variables really are that need to be studied (Crawford, 2019, p. 71)! An example where you may use qualitative research would be if you wanted to find out why people open up and IRA versus a 401k. The reasons vary and people have different situations in life and obstacles that contribute to their choice. This is an open-ended question; data is a not able to be collected in a statistical format however, the variables that come the from this are able to be studied deeper.

Statement 2:

Quantitative research methods are the best! Quantitative research uses this method to seek objectives through hypothesis that are testable and that are carefully designed studies (Crawford, 2019, p. 70). This type of research methods is deductive in nature and involves numerical data in which draws a conclusion and are generalized to population of interest. Crawford (2016). When using this method, the most researcher would use things such as questionnaires or surveys. If a researcher wanted to conduct research on how many college students preferred online courses vs preferred in-class courses, then they would use the quantitative research method with the selective tools. Researchers collect numerical data when completed. Conclusions are drawn from statistics and generalized to populations of interest (Crawford, 2019, p. 70).

Grading Rubrics

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a astrong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.