HLT313V The Workplace Violation PowerPoint

HLT313V The Workplace Violation PowerPoint

Perform an internet search to identify and research a situation where a health care organization or individual provider in your field of allied health was sanctioned by the accrediting body (e.g., The Joint Commission) and another regulatory body for violating one or more of the accrediting body’s workplace safety, risk management, and/or quality care requirements.

Taking on the role of chief safety or risk management officer in the organization or provider’s office who now must deliver an account of the chosen incident to the board of directors, develop a slide presentation containing a title slide, 12-15 slides of content, and a reference slide.

Your presentation must incorporate the following:

A brief summary of the incident, including a description as well as the outcome.
A summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards (e.g., local, state), or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident.
A discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights made by the health care organization or individual provider that did or may have led to the incident that occurred, and an account of the preventive steps that could have or should have been taken to avoid them.
A proposal outlining specific education or training the organization or provider will employ to ensure this type of incident does not occur in the future. Include concepts related to continuous quality improvement in your recommendations.
An inclusion of a CQI tool to be used to implement the training or education program being proposed.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HLT-313V	HLT-313V-O500	The Workplace Violation PowerPoint	150.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%)	Satisfactory (75.00%)	Good (85.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	40.0%
Summary of Sanctioned Incident	10.0%	Presentation does not provide a summary of the sanctioned incident.	Presentation includes a summary of the sanctioned incident, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete.	Presentation includes a basic summary of the sanctioned incident. Minimal detail and/or support are provided.	Presentation includes a complete summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support.	Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of the sanctioned incident. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Summary of The Applicable MIPPA Approved Regulatory Accrediting Body or Other Regulatory Standards	10.0%	Presentation does not provide a summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards, or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident.	Presentation includes a summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards, or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete.	Presentation includes a basic summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards, or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident. Minimal detail and/or support are provided.	Presentation includes a complete summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards, or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support.	Presentation includes a clear and thorough summary of the applicable MIPPA approved accrediting body, other regulatory standards, or licensing/certification standards that apply to the incident. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Mistakes and/or Oversights and Accounting of Preventive Steps	10.0%	Presentation does not provide a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken.	Presentation includes a discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete.	Presentation includes a basic discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Minimal detail and/or support are provided.	Presentation includes a complete discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support.	Presentation includes a clear and thorough discussion of the mistakes and/or oversights or of the accounting of preventive steps that could have been taken. Presentation analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Training or educational proposal	10.0%	Proposal does not provide a training or educational proposal.	Proposal includes a training or educational proposal, but elements are missing or the submission is otherwise incomplete.	Proposal includes a basic training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Minimal detail and/or support are provided.	Proposal includes a complete training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal incorporates most essential details and provides appropriate support.	Proposal includes a clear and thorough training or educational proposal which includes concepts related to continuous quality improvement. Proposal analyzes supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Organization and Development	60.0%
Presentation of Content	40.0%	The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.	The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout	5.0%	The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	5.0%	Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.	Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Essay writing help – HLT313V The Workplace Violation PowerPoint Online Essay Writing Agency – Essay Shredder.

Write my Essay. Premium essay writing services is the ideal place for homework help or essay writing service. if you are looking for affordable, high quality & non-plagiarized papers, click on the button below to place your order. Provide us with the instructions and one of our writers will deliver a unique, no plagiarism, and professional paper.

Get help with your toughest assignments and get them solved by a Reliable Custom Papers Writing Company. Save time, money and get quality papers. Buying an excellent plagiarism-free paper is a piece of cake!

All our papers are written from scratch. We can cover any assignment/essay in your field of study.