Critical Analysis Portfolio And Presentation Proposal

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

IDS 403 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Critical Analysis Portfolio and Presentation Proposal

Overview For the first part of your final project, the critical analysis portfolio, you will select an issue or event in technology and critically analyze it through the four general education lenses: history, humanities, social sciences, and natural and applied sciences. By viewing the issue/event through these lenses, you will gain insight into how technology affects society as well as both your own individual framework of perception and the choices, attitudes, and behaviors of others in the world around you.

For this first milestone, due in Module Two, you will select an issue or event to analyze through the four general education lenses. You will explain the issue or event and its relationship to technology as well as describe its connection to all four lenses.

Prompt First, review the module resources you have so far encountered as well as your work in Module One. In addition, it is suggested that you visit the IDS 403 LibGuide for guidance on how to select a topic. Select one issue or event in technology and write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses how this issue/event fits into the framework of technology and then addresses how each lens influences perceptions and attitudes toward the issue/event, technology, and society. The paper should outline each lens’s impact and framing of the issue or event. Be sure to provide a working thesis statement and clear definitions for your key terms.

Specifically, you must address the critical elements listed below.

I. Introduction: You will compile a series of critical analyses of a single event or issue in technology through the four general education lenses: history, humanities, natural and applied sciences, and social sciences.

A. Topic: Using the four lenses, explain how an issue or event within technology has or has not influenced modern society. II. Lens Connections: In this section of your assignment, you will describe the connections between your issue or event and each of the four general

education lenses. A. What is the connection of your issue or event to the lens of history for determining its impact on various institutions? Utilize evidence

from theory and research to support your analysis. B. What is the connection of your issue or event to the lens of the humanities? Utilize evidence from theory and research to support your

analysis. 1

http://libguides.snhu.edu/ids403
http://libguides.snhu.edu/ids403
C. What is the connection of your issue or event to the lens of the natural and applied sciences for determining its impact on various institutions? Utilize evidence from theory and research to support your analysis.

D. What is the connection of your issue or event to the lens of the social sciences for determining its impact on various institutions? Utilize evidence from theory and research to support your analysis.

Be sure to begin the research process early and use evidence from your research to support your responses. Refer to course resources, the LibGuide for this class, as well as any other pertinent resources to support your responses. Although at least two sources are required for each lens, note that you may use the same source for more than one lens if applicable. Relevant current news sources may be used with instructor approval. Incorporate instructor feedback into your final project.

Milestone Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Final Project Milestone One should be submitted as a Word document, 2 to 3 pages in length, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins. Begin building your references list for the final project, which requires you to support your responses with at least two sources for each lens from the assigned course resources and/or other scholarly sources located independently via the Shapiro Library. Note that you may use the same source for more than one lens if applicable. Cite your supporting sources in APA style.

Please note that the grading rubric for this milestone submission is not identical to that of the final project. The Final Project Part One Rubric will include an additional “Exemplary” category that provides guidance as to how you can go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission, as well as additional elements to address

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Introduction: Topic Explains how an issue or event

within technology has or has not influenced modern society through the four lenses

Explains how an issue or event within technology has or has not influenced modern society through the four lenses, but the explanation or usage or usage of the four lenses is cursory

Does not explain how an issue or event within technology has or has not influenced modern society through the four lenses

Lens Connections: History

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of history for determining its impact on various institutions, using evidence from theory and research to support analysis

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of history, but description is cursory or illogical, or supporting evidence is inappropriate or nonexistent

Does not describe the connection of the issue or event through the lens of history

https://libguides.snhu.edu/apa
Does not describe the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the natural sciences

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Lens Connections:

Humanities Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the humanities for determining its impact on various institutions, using evidence from theory and research to support analysis

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the humanities, but description is cursory or illogical, or supporting evidence is inappropriate or nonexistent

Does not describe the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the humanities

Lens Connections: Natural Sciences

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the natural sciences for determining its impact on various institutions, using evidence from theory and research to support analysis

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the natural sciences, but description is cursory or illogical, or supporting evidence is inappropriate or nonexistent

Lens Connections: Social Sciences

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the social sciences for determining its impact on various institutions, using evidence from theory and research to support analysis

Describes the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the social sciences, but description is cursory or illogical, or supporting evidence is inappropriate or nonexistent

Does not describe the connection of the issue or event through the lens of the social sciences

Articulation of Response

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

Total 100%

IDS 403 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Critical Analysis Portfolio and Presentation Proposal
Overview
Prompt
Milestone Rubric

Grading Rubrics

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.