3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice essay

3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice essay

3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice Page 1
3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice
Trimester 1, 2019
Assessment Item 2
Written Assignment (Individual):
Quality and Safety
2,000 words
Weighting 50%
Due Date: Tuesday 7th May 2019 at 17:00hrs
TASK RATIONALE / AIM:
The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) leads and
coordinates national improvements in safety and quality in health care. It has developed a
framework for safe and high quality care with three core principles – that care is consumer
centred, driven by information, and organised for safety (ACSQHC, 2010).
In addition to this framework, ACSQHC have developed National Safety and Quality Health
Service (NSQHS) Standards to ‘protect the public from harm and to improve the quality of
health service provision’ (ACSQHC, 2017, p. 5). The Registered Nurse is integral to every
standard that has been developed by the ACSQHC.
This assessment is designed to enable you to demonstrate an understanding of quality and
safety in health care through the critical discussion of one of the National Safety and Quality
Health Service Standards.
This assessment will address learning outcome 2.
TASK INSTRUCTIONS:
This task requires you to write a 2,000-word assignment. Before you write your assignment,
you will need to:
• Choose one of the following National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS)
Standards (ACSQHC, 2017) as the topic of your assignment.
• Clinical governance (Standard 1)
• Partnering with consumers (Standard 2)
• Preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infection (Standard 3)
• Comprehensive care (Standard 5)
• Communicating for safety (Standard 6)
• Blood management (Standard 7)
Please note, the following two NSQHS standards are not included as topic choices.
• Medication safety (Standard 4)
• Recognising and responding to acute deterioration (Standard 8).
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice Page 2
• Identify the type of process and outcome data that could be collected, analysed and fed
back for improvements in care relevant to your chosen standard. (You may wish to refer
to the article by Donabedian, 1988, as a starting point). This area for action aligns with
step 2.2 of the Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care (ACSQHC,
2010).
• Research the topic of quality and safety in health care in Australia then identify and
analyse scholarly literature that is relevant to your assignment topic, namelyyour:
• chosen standard,
• a clinical care activity relevant to this standard,
• process and outcome data required to monitor outcomes/improvements relevant to
the standard.
• Following these steps, write your assignment. Your assignment should include:
1. An introduction or first paragraph that clearly introduces the topic, identifies the
NSQHS standard (from the allocated options), outlines what will be covered in the
assignment and provides a thesis statement (what to expect in theassignment).
2. A critical discussion of quality and safety in the Australian health care system,
supported by scholarly literature (at least five sources published after2014).
3. A critical discussion of a clinical care activity relevant to your chosen standard,
including the risks or impact of low quality care and how it can be improved.
Discussion is supported by scholarly literature (at least five sources published after
2014).
4. A critical discussion of how process and outcome data could be collected, analysed
and fed back for improvements in clinical care. Discussion is supported by scholarly
literature (at least five sources published after 2014).
5. A conclusion which summarises your argument without introducing anynew
information.
References:
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). (2010). Australian
safety and quality framework for health care. Retrieved from
https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/national-priorities/australian-safety-and-qualityframework-for-health-care/
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). (2017). National
safety and quality health service standards (2nd ed.). Sydney, Aust.: Author.
Retrieved from https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/assessment-to-thensqhs-standards/
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743-
1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice Page 3
OTHER ELEMENTS:
• Always refer to the Griffith Health Writing and Referencing Guide
• Provide one reference list at the end of your written assignment which presents at least
15 references from scholarly literature in alphabetical order.
• State your word count (excluding your reference list) on the Assignment Coversheet.
• Do not exceed 2,000 words. Words over 2,000 will not be read or marked.
• Submit your DRAFT assignment via Turnitin as per the instructions on your
Learning@Griffith course site. [Submit in the ‘Assessment’ tab].
• Examine the Turnitin report for your draft assignment. If you have text-matching
identified in the written section of the assignment, this may be used as the basis of
reporting an academic integrity concern.
• Submit your FINAL assignment via Turnitin as per the instructions on your
Learning@Griffith course site. [Submit in the ‘Assessment’ tab]. Keep your Turnitin
receipt as evidence of successful submission. Check you have submitted the correct
assignment file.
• Email yourself a copy of your final assignment file so you have a contemporaneous
record of your submission.
3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice Page 4

MARKING CRITERIA A2 Quality and Safety	POSSIBLE MARKS
1. Introduction (Approx 250 words)
• The first paragraph clearly introduces the topic, identifies the NSQHS standard (from the allocated options), outlines what will be covered inthe assignment and provides a thesis statement (what to expect in the assignment).	5
2. Quality and Safety in the Australian health care system (Approx 500 words)
• Critically discusses quality and safety in the Australian health care system. • The explanation demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues; e.g. why quality and safety are important considerations and how these are addressed as part of the core business of health care organisations.	10
3. Clinical care activity (Approx 500 words)
• Identifies and critically discusses a clinical care activity central to thechosen NSQHS standard. • The discussion demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues;e.g. the risks or impact of low quality care and how quality can be improved.	10
4. Driven by information (Approx 500 words)
• Defines process and outcome data and provides examples of each. • Critically discusses how process and outcome data could be collected, analysed and fed back for improvements in clinical care. The discussion demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues.	10
5. Conclusion (Approx 250 words)
• Summarises the argument without introducing any new information.	5

3806NRS: Professional Nursing Practice Page 5

6. Evidence and referencing
• Demonstrates ability to apply research concepts and principles such as use of databases, critique of quality, relevant and up to date literature. • Discussion is supported by at least 15 relevant, high quality,evidence based, scholarly sources from 2014 onwards. • Referencing (in-text citations and reference list entries) as perAPA Referencing Guidelines (APA Style 6th Edition). • Provides at least 15 references from scholarly literature, in alphabetical order, in onelist which starts on a separate page.	5
7. Academic writing and presentation
• Is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, well-constructed sentences and appropriate paragraph structures. • Uses academic language throughout. • Conforms to the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines. • Meets the 2,000-word length requirements (excluding reference list).	5
Total marks	50

3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice – Assessment Task 2: Quality and Safety Marking rubric
Quality and Safety (AT 2): Marking rubric Page 1

Criteria (Mark allocation)	Excellent	Very good	Good	Satisfactory	Poor / Needs improvement
1. Introduction The first paragraph clearly introduces the topic, outlines what will be covered in the assignment and provides a thesis statement (what to expect in the assignment).	Excellent introduction. Engaging first paragraph that clearly introduces topic and outlines what will be covered in the assignment. Flags what to expect in the assignment.	Very high standard of introduction. First paragraph clearly introduces topic and outlines what will be covered in the assignment. Provides a thesis statement that flags what to expect in the assignment.	High standard of introduction. First paragraph introduces topic and outlines some points that will be covered in the assignment.	Adequate attempt of introducing the assignment but room for improvement.	An inadequate attempt to introduce the assignment. Does not outline what will be covered or provide a thesis statement.
Maximum 5 marks	4.5 – 5.0	4.0	3.5	2.5 – 3.0	≤ 2.0
2. Quality and safety in Australian health care system Critically discusses quality and safety in the Australian health care system. The explanation demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues; e.g. why quality and safety are important considerations and how these are addressed as part of the core business of health care organisations.	Discussion focuses on quality and safety in the Australian health care system. Strong critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Discussion focuses on quality and safety in the Australian health care system. Very good critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Discussion focuses on quality and safety in the Australian health care system. Good critical thinking and analysis of the issues within the topic.	Discussion focuses on quality and safety in the Australian health care system. Satisfactory level of critical thinking and analysis however much room for improvement (needs better conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic).	Discussion lacks focus on quality and safety in the Australian health care system and/or poor critical thinking and analysis with little logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.
Maximum 10 marks	8.5 – 10.0	7.5 -8.0	6.5 – 7.0	5.0 – 6.0	≤ 4.5
3. Clinical care activity Identifies and critically discusses a clinical care activity central to the chosen NSQHS standard. The discussion demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues; e.g. the risks or impact of low quality care and how quality can be improved.	Appropriate choice of a clinical care activity. Strong critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Appropriate choice of a clinical care activity. Very good critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Appropriate choice of a clinical care activity. Good critical thinking and analysis of the issues within the topic.	Appropriate choice of a clinical care activity. Satisfactory level of critical thinking and analysis however much room for improvement (needs better conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic).	Inappropriate choice of a clinical care activity and/or poor critical thinking and analysis with little logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.
Maximum 10 marks	8.5 – 10.0	7.5 -8.0	6.5 – 7.0	5.0 – 6.0	≤ 4.5

3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice – Assessment Task 2: Quality and Safety Marking rubric
Quality and Safety (AT 2): Marking rubric Page 2

Criteria (Mark allocation)	Excellent	Very good	Good	Satisfactory	Poor / Needs improvement
4. Driven by information Defines process and outcome data and provides examples of each. Critically discusses how process and outcome data could be collected, analysed and fed back for improvements in clinical care. The discussion demonstrates critical thinking and analysis of the issues.	Defines process and outcome data and provides excellent examples of each. Strong critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Defines process and outcome data and provides very good examples of each. Very good critical thinking and analysis as evidenced by logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.	Defines process and outcome data and provides good examples of each. Good critical thinking and analysis of the issues within the topic.	Defines process and outcome data. Satisfactory level of critical thinking and analysis however much room for improvement (needs better conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic).	Lacks clear definitions and/or examples. Poor critical thinking and analysis with little logical conceptualisation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the issues within the topic.
Maximum 10 marks	8.5 – 10.0	7.5 -8.0	6.5 – 7.0	5.0 – 6.0	≤ 4.5
5. Conclusion The last paragraph clearly summarises what was argued and concludes the task without introducing any new information.	Excellent conclusion. The last paragraph is a sophisticated summary of what was argued in the assignment. Concludes the task without introducing any new information.	Very high standard of conclusion. The last paragraph is a thorough summary of what was argued in the assignment. Concludes the task without introducing any new information.	High standard of conclusion. The last paragraph is a sound summary of what was argued in the assignment. Concludes the task without introducing any new information.	Adequate attempt at concluding the assignment but room for improvement.	An inadequate attempt to conclude the assignment. Does not summarise what was covered in the assignment. Introduces new information.
Maximum 5 marks	4.5 – 5.0	4.0	3.5	2.5 – 3.0	≤ 2.0

3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice – Assessment Task 2: Quality and Safety Marking rubric
Quality and Safety (AT 2): Marking rubric Page 3

Criteria (Mark allocation)	Excellent	Very good	Good	Satisfactory	Poor / Needs improvement
6. Evidence and referencing Demonstrates evidence of ability to apply research concepts and principles such as use of databases, critique of quality, relevant and up to date literature. Utilisation of appropriate literature/research data to support ideas on the chosen topic. Argument supported by at least 15 relevant, high quality, evidence based, scholarly sources from 2014 onwards. Referencing (in-text citations and reference list entries) as per APA Referencing Guidelines (APA Style 6th Edition). All references are in one list, in alphabetical order, which starts on a separate page	Sourced literature strongly supports the topic as evidenced by the selection of seminal work in the area, peer reviewed literature, and government reports. Strong evidence of the application of research concepts and principles. Demonstrates a sophisticated ability to synthesise high quality scholarly literature to provide an evidence-base for points discussed. Uses at least 15 sources from 2014. Strictly adheres to APA Style 6th Edition for referencing (in text citations and reference list entries).	Sourced literature supports the topic as evidenced by the selection of some seminal work and peer-reviewed literature. Clear evidence of the application of research concepts and principles. Demonstrates a very good ability to research and synthesise scholarly literature to provide an evidence-base for the points discussed. Uses at least 15 sources from 2014. Very good adherence to APA Style 6th Edition for referencing.	Sourced literature somewhat supports the topic as evidenced by peer-reviewed literature and government reports. Evidence of the application of research concepts and principles. Demonstrates a sound ability to research; identifies many appropriate scholarly sources and uses evidence appropriately to support statements. Uses at least 15 sources from 2014. Good adherence to APA Style 6th Edition for referencing however there is some room for improvement.	Sourced literature weakly supports the topic as evidenced by the use of websites and some peer reviewed literature. Minor evidence of the application of research concepts and principles. Demonstrates a satisfactory ability to research; identifies several appropriate scholarly sources and uses evidence to support statements. Uses at least 15 sources from 2014. Satisfactory adherence to APA Style 6th Edition for referencing however there is room for improvement.	Sourced literature weakly supports the topic as evidenced by the use of websites and some peer reviewed literature. Minor evidence of the application of research concepts and principles. Does not demonstrate a satisfactory ability to research; identify and use scholarly sources. Has not strictly adhered to APA Style 6th Edition for referencing. Poor attempt.
Maximum 5 marks	4.5 – 5.0	4.0	3.5	2.5 – 3.0	≤ 2.0
7. Academic writing and presentation Is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, well-constructed sentences and appropriate paragraph structures. Uses academic language throughout. Conforms to the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines. Meets the word length requirements – excluding reference list.	Assignment is exceptionally well written and presented. Meets the word length requirements.	Assignment is very well written and presented. There were some minor issues noted that detracted from the presentation. Meets the word length requirements.	Assignment was well written and presented. There were several issues noted that detracted from the presentation. Meets the word length requirements.	Assignment was presented to a satisfactory standard however there were many issues that detracted from the assignment presentation. Meets a satisfactory level of academic writing however there is room for improvement. Meets the word length requirements.	Assignment is not presented to a satisfactory standard. Does not follow the assignment presentation guidelines. Major issues with academic writing. Does not meet the word length requirements.
Maximum 5 marks	4.5 – 5.0	4.0	3.5	2.5 – 3.0	≤ 2.0
TOTAL MARKS (out of 50)	42.5 – 50	37.5 – 42.0	32.5 – 37.0	25.0 – 32.0	≤ 24.5

3806NRS Professional Nursing Practice essay

Write my Essay. Premium essay writing services is the ideal place for homework help or essay writing service. if you are looking for affordable, high quality & non-plagiarized papers, click on the button below to place your order. Provide us with the instructions and one of our writers will deliver a unique, no plagiarism, and professional paper.

Get help with your toughest assignments and get them solved by a Reliable Custom Papers Writing Company. Save time, money and get quality papers. Buying an excellent plagiarism-free paper is a piece of cake!

All our papers are written from scratch. We can cover any assignment/essay in your field of study.