Entity Relationship Diagram Discussion

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

You have to derive an Entity Relationship Diagram(ERD), Schema and Understanding(3 page report) for your Project.

•There will be a report for this project.

•Make sure you understand the project completely based on the content taught in the classes

•If you are unsure or confused about something, make sure you clear it then and there. Do NOT assume things on your own and submit your project. It will result in loss of points.

•All components of an ERD have to be indicated(relations/cardinality/tables, Foreign/Primary Key,etc) and be complete. Failure to do so will result in loss of points.

•This has to correspond to your website design, which would be implemented in the later projects

•Please follow the rubric/project document/syllabus/schedule at all times

•Understanding of your Project, meaning what you understood on a whole of the content that has been taught on the lectures about the Project (Entire website design, not just DB), how the system works, how many roles are there and your understanding on them.(2 page Report)

•You would also describe how you plan to include any useful creative additions which you would be using in the later phases of the project.

Report:

Make sure you include all necessary explanations for all aspects of the ERD, if needed
Your understanding of the entire project
In your understanding, provide reasons so as to why you have given a particular parameter (one-many relationship, foreign key ; which could be justified in accordance with the described website)
It is best to justify your reasons/explanations with the help of diagrams
You can also compare your reasons/supporting diagrams with the design of the main website/Database

Grading Rubrics

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a astrong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.